Global forests soaking up carbon at quickening rate
Increased uptake not keeping pace with fossil fuel emissions
Feb 25, 2019 - by Laura Snider
Feb 25, 2019 - by Laura Snider
The world's forests are taking up increasingly more carbon, partially offsetting the carbon being released by the burning of fossil fuels and by deforestation in the tropics, according to a new synthesis of model simulations.
The findings, published in the journal Biogeosciences, suggest that forests are growing more vigorously, and therefore, locking away more carbon. Even so, the concentration of heat-trapping carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is still on the rise.
"Every decade, Earth’s forests are taking up carbon faster than the previous decade," said Britton Stephens, a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and a co-author of the study. "The same is true of the oceans. But even together, the ocean and the land are not keeping up with industrial carbon emissions, and the global concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is increasing at an accelerating rate."
The increased plant growth in global forests could be due to a variety of factors, including higher concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, warmer temperatures, or increased availability of nitrogen.
The new study also contributes to a mounting body of evidence that tropical forests might take up more carbon — and northern temperate forests might take up less carbon — than many scientists once thought.
"The forests we aren't cutting down in the tropics are taking up a lot of carbon," Stephens said.
The study was authored by an international group of researchers, led by NCAR scientist Benjamin Gaubert. The scientists were funded by the National Science Foundation, which is NCAR's sponsor, as well as NASA, the European Union's Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service, Japan's Environment Research and Technology Fund of the Ministry of Environment, Climate Change Canada, and the Canadian Space Agency.
"This team of scientists has significantly improved our knowledge of how much carbon dioxide gets into the atmosphere," said Sherri Hunt, a program director in the National Science Foundation's Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences. "Understanding what factors control the amount of this important greenhouse gas is critical for predicting future climate conditions and estimating the contribution of human actions."
The new study relies on a synthesis of results from 10 different "inverse transport models," which are atmospheric models run in reverse. To use them, scientists input the "results" — the actual levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide measured all over the world during the past several decades — and force the model to predict how much carbon dioxide must have been emitted and reabsorbed in different parts of the Earth system to match the measurements.
This effort is the third inverse transport model comparison project of this scale. In the first comparison, published in 2002, the model results diverged from one another significantly, but the average pointed toward the presence of a large carbon sink in the Northern Hemisphere outside the tropics.
Since the original comparison, the model results have begun to come together.
"We find that the models now agree a lot better with each other and with independent aircraft data," said Gaubert. "Collectively, they are telling us that both the tropics and the northern temperate region are taking up more carbon than in the past, but the amount being taken up by intact tropical forests is a bigger surprise."
The remaining disagreement among the models is mostly related to uncertainty about how much carbon is being emitted into the atmosphere by the burning of fossil fuels. Previously, the uncertainties most affecting model spread were related to sparse observations and the physics contained in the models themselves.
"Despite the fact that all the models we used in the analysis are built differently, they come to similar solutions, which reflects our increased understanding of how carbon moves through the Earth system," said Gaubert. "To further zero in on where the carbon is going, we need better inventories of society's carbon emissions to feed into the models."
The new study finds that, averaged over the past decade, the carbon flux in the tropics is about zero — meaning the additional amount of carbon being released by deforestation (an estimated 1.5 billion metric tons a year) is being compensated for by increased uptake in the remaining forest. This expanded capacity of intact forests to act as a carbon sink suggests that the additional carbon dioxide in the air may be fertilizing those forests, allowing them to grow and store carbon more quickly, though changes in precipitation, temperature, and deforestation could also be playing important roles.
The researchers said it isn't clear how long Earth's land areas will be able to keep increasing carbon uptake in the face of ongoing deforestation and continued emissions of fossil fuels, even with the help of fertilization.
"The limits of carbon fertilization aren't yet well understood," Stephens said. "But we do know that fossil fuel emissions are outpacing Earth's ability to take up carbon, and the gap may widen in the future."